Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tamira Paszek vs Quinn Gleason Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paszek vs Gleason analysis and find out who is favored!
Tamira Paszek vs Quinn Gleason Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paszek 1 - 0 Gleason
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paszek has won 45.49% of points on his second serve, while Gleason has won 41.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paszek, in recent form, has won 59.15% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gleason has won 60%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.64% and 30.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paszek has saved 53.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gleason has saved 37.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paszek has won 65.71% of matches played (W/L 46/ 24), with Gleason winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paszek has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 56/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 49/ 47). Gleason has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 82/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Paszek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.41% of matches (W/L 38/ 21), where as Gleason has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paszek winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paszek winning 2 and Gleason winning 0. The last match between Paszek and Gleason was at the W60 Naples, 10-05-2023, First, Clay with Tamira Paszek getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paszek and Gleason have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paszek winning 0 times and Gleason 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paszek winning 1, and Gleason 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paszek has played against opponents with an average rank of 318.94 while Gleason has played against players with an average rank of 364.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paszek has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gleason has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paszek has converted 52.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gleason has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
299
Rank
26
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
885
Rank
323
High
29
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
57% (396-300)
Career Total W/L
55% (153-125)
69% (22-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,345,638
Career Prize Money
$4,345
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tamira Paszek | Quinn Gleason |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:0 | 1:53:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (41/60) | 77% (55/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (27/41) | 42% (23/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (11/19) | 56% (9/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (39/71) | 37% (22/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-1 |
Stats 
Tamira Paszek
Player
Quinn Gleason
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
55 of
71)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tamira Paszek | Quinn Gleason |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (22/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (46/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (369/286) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 74% (17/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 70 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 288.34 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1377/1953) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (812/1377) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (262/576) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (151/288) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (986/1978) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (15/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (22/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (21/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (21/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tamira Paszek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Tamira Paszek
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve %
53%
(
17 of
32)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Hikaru Sato
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
112)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Maria Martinez Vaquero
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Tamira Paszek
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Hannah Klugman
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Mihaela Djakovic
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
52%
(
29 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Klaudija Bubelyte
Player
Tamira Paszek
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
75%
(
72 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
65 of
89)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
53%
(
47 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
53 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Sophie Drakeford-Lewis
87%
(
54 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
0%
(
0 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Quinn Gleason Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Quinn Gleason
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Quinn Gleason
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Quinn Gleason
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Quinn Gleason
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quinn Gleason
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Quinn Gleason
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nina Radovanovic
Player
Quinn Gleason
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Quinn Gleason
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
79%
(
68 of
86)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
50%
(
44 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Paszek Vs Gleason Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
